If Only I Had……….


Channelling Cartier-Bresson at the Queensland Art Gallery; © Ian Poole, 2011.

If only I had a Leica has been a plea quietly sobbed into my short black expresso for more years than I can remember.  It usually follows a visit to a gallery showing high quality black and white photographs – like a Cartier-Bresson retrospective; or it comes after getting images back from being entered in a competition bearing less than expected scores stamped on the back.  Or in the midst of a bout of photographic depression brought on by a bad case of equipment envy.  Whilst this well recognised clinical condition is usually associated with the male of the profession (boy’s toys), it is known to effect both genders of photographers.

Hang on – I do own a Leica! A IIIg – what an uncomfortable camera it is.  Purchased by taking advantage of someone else’s misfortune, yours truly, the eternal single lens camera expert with many years of mostly Nikon professional experience behind him, then leaps into the world driving a range finder camera.  Let’s ignore the convoluted, complex manner of inserting film into the Leica – the very nature of the range finder is to be able to both see the subject area as well as peripheral field – something that a SLR exponent has long learnt to either ignore or develop a work-around.  The two methods of viewing, whilst perfectly workable, are not readily nor easily compatible. And we still will not go into the method of loading film…….

The object of my camera lust is now the master of my visual downfall!  And I had desired this device for so long.


Sinar P2

Camera lust stories are legend.  In the days of large format film, to own a Sinar was to be at the top of your game.  But then which format – 5×4” or 5×7” or 10×8”.  Whilst the pragmatic Swiss elves creating Sinar in Shaffhausen would argue that the interchangeability of their product was the solution; that very versatility was a fraught debate.  The 5×4” (10x12cm) is small in the large format arena, and 5×7” (12x18cm) is the perfect compromise for a 35mm film shooter; and the choices for a 10×8” (20x24cm) enlarger are very limited – unless you wish to only produce classic contact prints.

Dare I mention Canon and Nikon DSLRs in the same breath?  It would be easier to settle the Holden versus Ford battle – although market forces and a new Australian Government may settle that one without too much long-held bias.

Moving rapidly back to cameras, I can re-enter this debate having owned both of the major DSLRs at various times.  Lusting (and changing) camera brands has hidden trials and tribulations.  All those carefully gathered filters and attachments rarely make the transfer easily, and there is a financial catch to succumbing to this disease.  Unlike a very good friend of mine who currently owns a Nikon D4, but has carefully manipulated the dials so that his Nikon has the feel and operation of a Canon.  Even the true pedant cannot be immune from this insidious disease of camera lust.

This article first appeared in f11 Online Magazine – Issue 27


One thought on “If Only I Had……….

  1. Yes, these are perceptive comments indeed.

    Years ago when I sold Leicas I noted that people who purchased a Leica M5 (more than 3 decades ago!) improved their photography. I guess this was because anyone who dropped five large on a camera body and lens wasn’t going to trash their investment by being sloppy about focussing or ignoring the nice TTL meter they had just paid for.

    Now that Leica has acquired Sinar a new Leinar or Sinica may be in the works; the ultimate camera-shaped lust object perhaps.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s